Astrostudents-Group Discussions: Re: [astrostudents] Re: rahu 1st house

all learned members

respected prbhakar ji, nirmal ji,

dear jitin syal,

I hv an Goswami ji book tht book says rahu in first house Raashi Phal ka

so tht means not an Sign effect dont mix sign/Raashi of vedic astrology with Lal kitab Raashi phal.plz just read Armaan , farmaan And 1941 by yograj prbhakar before 1952.To understand Raashi phal and Grah phal.

thanx

learner of lal kitab

jattin.

--- On Mon, 11/24/08, Nirmal Kumar Bhardwaj <nirbhar@gmail.com> wrote:

From: Nirmal Kumar Bhardwaj <nirbhar@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [astrostudents] Re: rahu 1st house
To: astrostudents@yahoogroups.com
Date: Monday, November 24, 2008, 4:14 PM

Dear Jatin Ji,

Though I have not the tralslation/ treatise of Goswami Ji Book. But in my opinion it is a translation error or it is also possible that treatise has been written with preset mind of traditional astrology Rashis(signs) in lalkitab are reffered as the Ghars of Planets not pakka ghar. Like Aries(mesh) is the ghar of Mars, Vrishabh is of venus Mithun is of Mercury.Rahu is always Ucha in ghars of Mercury and neccha in ghars of Brihaspati. Gemini and Kanya are ghars of Mercury that is why Rahu behave like uchha in these house. Planet 's effect in a house influenced by the interrelationship with other planets who are having any type influence in that house by virtue of its ghar, pakka ghar, uchha or neecha rashi.

You are right. Nakshatras and Sighns are not used here as used in traditional astrology.

Regards

Nirmal

On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 3:09 PM, jitinsyal82 <jitinsyal82@ yahoo.co. uk> wrote:

pranam all gurujans,
it's unfortunate and inconvenient not being able to read urdu hence
relying on other sources, however i'll do my best to source my
query/question.
on page 46 of english edition LK(1952) by Pt. madhav goswami ji it
says rahu in 1st house is of sign effect, now my concern/query was
whether rahu behaves as per the sign posited in, as it is obvious in
lal kitab that we don't consider sign(rashi) anywhere so why does the
text states sign then?(mind you nothing against a learned individual
like Pt. goswami ji)

i was almost certain that Pt.joshi ji gave no weightage to nakshatras
and rashis in lal kitab but wasn't sure, or i thought may be it's
just me not being able to understand it properly and as it turns out
later was the case.
i thank you all for clearing my doubt, atleast now i know for sure
that i only to need to concentrate on the houses rather than the
signs which they occupy.

yours respectfully
jitin syal

--- In astrostudents@ yahoogroups. com, "kapatjal" <kapatjal@...> wrote:
>
> dear Friends,
>
> As i understand,LK system does not give any importance to the
signs
> as given in tne prepared horoscopes by vedic pundits; in fact signs
> from 1 to 12 are fixed in the 12 houses of the horoscope. This is
> the basics of LK astrology. So there is no qustion of there being
> Rahu or any other planet in any given sign for consideraiton of the
> planet as par LK system.
>
> with best wishes;
> sincerely,
> kiranjit--- In astrostudents@ yahoogroups. com, bhupesh sharma
> <bhupeshastro@> wrote:
> >
> > Dear Jitin Ji
> > " Rahu in 1st shows result as per the sign it is posited in "
> > As you mentioned about Rahu Khna No 1 in LK 1952 English
Version ,
> It must be a serious mistake because there is no mention of sign
> even in the LK1952 , LK Farman 1939 , and in the LK 1942 .
> >
> > Pandit Bhupesh Shharma
> >
> > --- On Sat, 11/22/08, Yograj Prabhakar <yr_prabhakar@> wrote:
> >
> > From: Yograj Prabhakar <yr_prabhakar@>
> > Subject: [astrostudents] Re: rahu 1st house
> > To: astrostudents@ yahoogroups. com
> > Date: Saturday, November 22, 2008, 1:48 PM
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Dear Jitin
> >
> > You have written:
> > // 'rahu in 1st shows result as per the sign it is posited in'//
> >
> > My dear friend, there is no mention of Sign (Rashi) in the
chapter
> Rahu khana number 1 in Lal kitab-1952. I think there is some
serious
> mistake in the book/chapter you have mentioned .
> >
> > Sincerely
> > Yograj Prabhakar
> >
> > --- In astrostudents@ yahoogroups. com, "jitinsyal82"
> <jitinsyal82@ ...> wrote:
> > >
> > > pranam all gurujans,
> > >
> > > i just thought we haven't discussed effect of any planet in a
> house for
> > > a long time now so might as well start with rahu in 1st.
> > >
> > > i read in english version LK 1952(by pt. madhav goswami ji)
> that 'rahu
> > > in 1st shows result as per the sign it is posited in'
> > > does that mean we take the sign into consideration when
deriving
> > > results for rahu in this house? for eg. rahu in gemini would be
> > > beneficial and so on........
> > >
> > > i also request everyone to kindly share their knowledge in
> regards to
> > > the above situation.
> > >
> > > thanks
> > > yours respectfully
> > > jitin syal
> > >
> >
>