Dear Jitin
You have written:
// 'rahu in 1st shows result as per the sign it is posited in'//
My dear friend, there is no mention of Sign (Rashi) in the chapter Rahu khana number 1 in Lal kitab-1952. I think there is some serious mistake in the book/chapter you have mentioned .
Sincerely
Yograj Prabhakar
--- In astrostudents@
>
> pranam all gurujans,
>
> i just thought we haven't discussed effect of any planet in a house for
> a long time now so might as well start with rahu in 1st.
>
> i read in english version LK 1952(by pt. madhav goswami ji) that 'rahu
> in 1st shows result as per the sign it is posited in'
> does that mean we take the sign into consideration when deriving
> results for rahu in this house? for eg. rahu in gemini would be
> beneficial and so on........
>
> i also request everyone to kindly share their knowledge in regards to
> the above situation.
>
> thanks
> yours respectfully
> jitin syal
>
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch format to Traditional
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe
__,_._,___
No comments:
Post a Comment