Astrostudents-Group Discussions: [astrostudents] Re: rahu 1st house

pranam jatin ji,
sir first of all please accept my apologies if i didn't thank you
enough in the last post but i am more than happy to do it here
(again). sir i thank you whole heartedly for doing such a splendid
work in rectifying me and giving me a better understanding(point
taken on board).
As far as the other books goes, trust me that would be the top thing
on my 'to do' list when i visit india again, unless ofcourse a person
like yourself can arrange a copy.
sir thank you very much for taking your precious time out and going
that extra yard in order to help a novice like me. :)

yours sincerely
jitin syal

--- In astrostudents@yahoogroups.com, "jitinsyal82" <jitinsyal82@...>
wrote:
>
> dear jatin kapila ji,
>
> i was almost certain that sign plays no importance in lal kitab but
> couldn't get over the fact that, why the word "sign" was being
> mentioned in lal kitab especially with rahu in 1st.
> i do however thank you for clearing my doubt and sharing your
> experienced thoughts with me. you certainly have helped me
understand
> the concept better and in time like these i wonder, what would i do
> without a senior member like yourself.
>
> thank you for en-lighting us.
>
> also i am not as fortunate as you to have 1941 hindi version by
shri
> yograj prabhakar ji(and meet him personally). i will deem it a
great
> favour if you can somehow organise to send me a copy in adelaide
> (australia). i will pay for the expenses beared.
>
> thank you.
>
> yours respectfully
> jitin syal
>
> --- In astrostudents@yahoogroups.com, Jattin Kapila
> <jattinkapila@> wrote:
> >
> > all learned members
> > respected prbhakar ji, nirmal ji,
> > dear jitin syal,
> > hi
> > I hv an Goswami ji book tht book says rahu in first house Raashi
> Phal ka
> > so tht means not an Sign effect dont mix sign/Raashi of vedic
> astrology with Lal kitab Raashi phal.plz just read Armaan , farmaan
> And 1941 by yograj prbhakar before 1952.To understand Raashi phal
and
> Grah phal.
> > thanx
> > learner of lal kitab
> > jattin.
> >
> >
> > --- On Mon, 11/24/08, Nirmal Kumar Bhardwaj <nirbhar@> wrote:
> >
> > From: Nirmal Kumar Bhardwaj <nirbhar@>
> > Subject: Re: [astrostudents] Re: rahu 1st house
> > To: astrostudents@yahoogroups.com
> > Date: Monday, November 24, 2008, 4:14 PM
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Dear Jatin Ji,
> > Though I have not the tralslation/ treatise of Goswami Ji Book.
But
> in my opinion it is a translation error or it is also possible that
> treatise has been written with preset mind of traditional astrology
> Rashis(signs) in lalkitab are reffered as the Ghars of Planets not
> pakka ghar. Like Aries(mesh) is the ghar of Mars, Vrishabh is of
> venus Mithun is of Mercury.Rahu is always Ucha in ghars of Mercury
> and neccha in ghars of Brihaspati. Gemini and Kanya are ghars of
> Mercury that is why Rahu behave like uchha in these house..
Planet 's
> effect in a house influenced by the interrelationship with other
> planets who are having any type influence in that house by virtue
of
> its ghar, pakka ghar, uchha or neecha rashi.
> >
> > You are right. Nakshatras and Sighns are not used here as used in
> traditional astrology.
> >
> > Regards
> > Nirmal
> > On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 3:09 PM, jitinsyal82 <jitinsyal82@
> yahoo.co. uk> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > pranam all gurujans,
> > it's unfortunate and inconvenient not being able to read urdu
hence
> > relying on other sources, however i'll do my best to source my
> > query/question.
> > on page 46 of english edition LK(1952) by Pt. madhav goswami ji
it
> > says rahu in 1st house is of sign effect, now my concern/query
was
> > whether rahu behaves as per the sign posited in, as it is obvious
> in
> > lal kitab that we don't consider sign(rashi) anywhere so why does
> the
> > text states sign then?(mind you nothing against a learned
> individual
> > like Pt. goswami ji)
> >
> > i was almost certain that Pt.joshi ji gave no weightage to
> nakshatras
> > and rashis in lal kitab but wasn't sure, or i thought may be it's
> > just me not being able to understand it properly and as it turns
> out
> > later was the case.
> > i thank you all for clearing my doubt, atleast now i know for
sure
> > that i only to need to concentrate on the houses rather than the
> > signs which they occupy.
> >
> > yours respectfully
> > jitin syal
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In astrostudents@ yahoogroups. com, "kapatjal" <kapatjal@>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > dear Friends,
> > >
> > > As i understand,LK system does not give any importance to the
> > signs
> > > as given in tne prepared horoscopes by vedic pundits; in fact
> signs
> > > from 1 to 12 are fixed in the 12 houses of the horoscope. This
is
> > > the basics of LK astrology. So there is no qustion of there
being
> > > Rahu or any other planet in any given sign for consideraiton of
> the
> > > planet as par LK system.
> > >
> > > with best wishes;
> > > sincerely,
> > > kiranjit--- In astrostudents@ yahoogroups. com, bhupesh sharma
> > > <bhupeshastro@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Dear Jitin Ji
> > > > " Rahu in 1st shows result as per the sign it is posited in "
> > > > As you mentioned about Rahu Khna No 1 in LK 1952 English
> > Version ,
> > > It must be a serious mistake because there is no mention of
sign
> > > even in the LK1952 , LK Farman 1939 , and in the LK 1942 .
> > > >
> > > > Pandit Bhupesh Shharma
> > > >
> > > > --- On Sat, 11/22/08, Yograj Prabhakar <yr_prabhakar@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > From: Yograj Prabhakar <yr_prabhakar@>
> > > > Subject: [astrostudents] Re: rahu 1st house
> > > > To: astrostudents@ yahoogroups. com
> > > > Date: Saturday, November 22, 2008, 1:48 PM
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Dear Jitin
> > > >
> > > > You have written:
> > > > // 'rahu in 1st shows result as per the sign it is posited
in'//
> > > >
> > > > My dear friend, there is no mention of Sign (Rashi) in the
> > chapter
> > > Rahu khana number 1 in Lal kitab-1952. I think there is some
> > serious
> > > mistake in the book/chapter you have mentioned .
> > > >
> > > > Sincerely
> > > > Yograj Prabhakar
> > > >
> > > > --- In astrostudents@ yahoogroups. com, "jitinsyal82"
> > > <jitinsyal82@ ...> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > pranam all gurujans,
> > > > >
> > > > > i just thought we haven't discussed effect of any planet in
a
> > > house for
> > > > > a long time now so might as well start with rahu in 1st.
> > > > >
> > > > > i read in english version LK 1952(by pt. madhav goswami ji)
> > > that 'rahu
> > > > > in 1st shows result as per the sign it is posited in'
> > > > > does that mean we take the sign into consideration when
> > deriving
> > > > > results for rahu in this house? for eg. rahu in gemini
would
> be
> > > > > beneficial and so on........
> > > > >
> > > > > i also request everyone to kindly share their knowledge in
> > > regards to
> > > > > the above situation.
> > > > >
> > > > > thanks
> > > > > yours respectfully
> > > > > jitin syal
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>