Astrostudents-Group Discussions: Re: [astrostudents] Re: rahu 1st house

Saturday, November 22, 2008

Re: [astrostudents] Re: rahu 1st house

Dear Jitin Ji

" Rahu in 1st shows result as per the sign it is posited in "

As you mentioned about Rahu Khna No 1 in LK 1952 English Version , It must be a serious mistake because there is no mention of sign even in the LK1952 , LK Farman 1939 , and in the LK 1942 .

Pandit Bhupesh Shharma

--- On Sat, 11/22/08, Yograj Prabhakar <yr_prabhakar@yahoo.com> wrote:

From: Yograj Prabhakar <yr_prabhakar@yahoo.com>
Subject: [astrostudents] Re: rahu 1st house
To: astrostudents@yahoogroups.com
Date: Saturday, November 22, 2008, 1:48 PM

Dear Jitin

You have written:
// 'rahu in 1st shows result as per the sign it is posited in'//

My dear friend, there is no mention of Sign (Rashi) in the chapter Rahu khana number 1 in Lal kitab-1952. I think there is some serious mistake in the book/chapter you have mentioned .

Sincerely
Yograj Prabhakar

--- In astrostudents@ yahoogroups. com, "jitinsyal82" <jitinsyal82@ ...> wrote:
>
> pranam all gurujans,
>
> i just thought we haven't discussed effect of any planet in a house for
> a long time now so might as well start with rahu in 1st.
>
> i read in english version LK 1952(by pt. madhav goswami ji) that 'rahu
> in 1st shows result as per the sign it is posited in'
> does that mean we take the sign into consideration when deriving
> results for rahu in this house? for eg. rahu in gemini would be
> beneficial and so on........
>
> i also request everyone to kindly share their knowledge in regards to
> the above situation.
>
> thanks
> yours respectfully
> jitin syal
>