Dear all,
Pardon my intrusion here. I dont have more knowledge than the Masters of Lalkitab present here, but I wish to say that signs do matter in the lalkitab placement of planets, subject to treating the Birth Chart as a Natural Chart whatever ascendant it may be.
Otherwise - Why would be ?
1) Saturn be considered a Malefic 3 times in the first house ? Is it not because the first House is the Exaltation sign of The Sun ?
2) Jupiter be considered as giving Malefic in the 10th ? Is it no because the 10th natural sign Capricorn is the debilitations sign of Jupiter ?
3) Mars considered as malefic in the 4th House ? Is it not because its the debilitation sign of Mars - Cancer ?
4) Sun is considered to be goodin the 5th House ? Is it not because Leo the natural sgn is The Suns own sign ?
5) Moon gives great wealth in the 2nd House ? Is it not because Taurus is the Exaltation sign of Moon in the natural Kala Purusha chart ?
Therefore how can one say that the significance of the signs has been ignored by the author of Lal Kitab ?
regards/Bhaskar.
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch format to Traditional
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe
__,_._,___
No comments:
Post a Comment