Vinay ji, totally agreed no new concept it is very clear there in
transliterated books. Regards. Kulbir.
On 3/9/09, Vinay kumar <v4vedic@gmail.
> Dear Vijay Ji,
> *[Quote]
>
> This difference in 'Khana and Rashi' in palm as he has clearly quoted is
> still not available, even in all the authentic translation made available
> till now.
> [Quote]*
>
> It is very well explained in all the authentic Lalkitabs. You may have
> missed by oversight.
> Article written by Mr. Bhandari is very informative and should be read by
> every lalkitab students.
> Many regards
> Vinay
>
> On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 5:00 PM, Vijay Goel <goyalvj@gmail.
>
>> Respected all,
>>
>> Today i downloaded the feb 09 issue of saptarishi magazine from
>> http://www.saptaris
>>
>> Here Shri Ravinder Bhandhariji in the article title 'The Mystic Redbook'
>> at
>> page number 226 has shown horoscope and the Makan Kundli relation.
>>
>> Secondly the most important factor he has corrected in the palmistry
>> concept that he clearly says that In phalanges of finger twelve rashi are
>> represented whereas at palm twelve 'KHANAS' are represented (not rashis).
>>
>> This again proves the relation of 36 years rashi dasa of LK and its
>> relation with phalanges of fingers as i wrote earlier.
>>
>> This difference in 'Khana and Rashi' in palm as he has clearly quoted is
>> still not available, even in all the authentic translation made available
>> till now.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Vijay Goel
>> Jaipur
>>
>>
>>
>
--
Sent from my mobile device
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch format to Traditional
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe
No comments:
Post a Comment