Dear Members,
I have seen the condition where Lal kitab totally contradict with Vedic
astrology.
Here is the birth chart:
HNO1 :(Rashi-7 ,Moon)
HN02 :(Rashi-8 ,Ketu )
HN03 :(Rashi-9 )
HNO4 :(Rashi-10 ,Mars)
HNO5 :(Rashi-11 )
HNO6 :(Rashi-12 ,Venus)
HNO7 :(Rash-1 ,Sun,Mercury)
HNO8 :(Rashi-2 ,Rahu)
HNO9 :(Rashi-3 ,Shani)
HNO10:(Rashi-
HNO11:(Rashi-
HNO12:(Rashi-
As per Vedic Astrology:
Ma,Ju,Su is exalted and all the other planets
is also in good position but as per Lal kitab
Ma,Ju,Su is debliated and remaining planets
are also not in good position(when we consider
first house as first rashi).
I consulted Vedic and Lalkitab astrologer and their
point of view is just opposite to each other.
Now my question is How the two system claim to be accurate
when the prediction is totally different.
My Suggestion:
When we make Birth chart according to Lal kitab we consider first
House as first rashi and predict afterward instead of that
If we move the rashi number 1 planets to house number 1 and
move all the planets according to that then I guess we can
overcome the contradiction I know this is not the rule but
atleast I am going to try this to see how the prediction is
comming.
Plz. post your suggestion it is urgent.
Regards
Ashok
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch format to Traditional
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe
No comments:
Post a Comment