Astrostudents-Group Discussions: Re: [astrostudents] Contradiction to Vedic astrology

Wednesday, March 25, 2009

Re: [astrostudents] Contradiction to Vedic astrology

Ashok ji, yes there are contradictions. What texts like chamatkar
chintamani say about mercury 11 is totally poles apart from what
lalkitab says about mercury 11. Regards. Kulbir.

On 3/25/09, y2k_aksingh <y2k_aksingh@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Dear Members,
> I have seen the condition where Lal kitab totally contradict with Vedic
> astrology.
> Here is the birth chart:
>
> HNO1 :(Rashi-7 ,Moon)
> HN02 :(Rashi-8 ,Ketu )
> HN03 :(Rashi-9 )
> HNO4 :(Rashi-10 ,Mars)
> HNO5 :(Rashi-11 )
> HNO6 :(Rashi-12 ,Venus)
> HNO7 :(Rash-1 ,Sun,Mercury)
> HNO8 :(Rashi-2 ,Rahu)
> HNO9 :(Rashi-3 ,Shani)
> HNO10:(Rashi-4,Jupiter)
> HNO11:(Rashi-5)
> HNO12:(Rashi-6)
>
> As per Vedic Astrology:
> Ma,Ju,Su is exalted and all the other planets
> is also in good position but as per Lal kitab
> Ma,Ju,Su is debliated and remaining planets
> are also not in good position(when we consider
> first house as first rashi).
>
> I consulted Vedic and Lalkitab astrologer and their
> point of view is just opposite to each other.
>
> Now my question is How the two system claim to be accurate
> when the prediction is totally different.
>
>
> My Suggestion:
>
> When we make Birth chart according to Lal kitab we consider first
> House as first rashi and predict afterward instead of that
> If we move the rashi number 1 planets to house number 1 and
> move all the planets according to that then I guess we can
> overcome the contradiction I know this is not the rule but
> atleast I am going to try this to see how the prediction is
> comming.
>
> Plz. post your suggestion it is urgent.
>
> Regards
> Ashok
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

--
Sent from my mobile device