Respected Rajinder Bhatia Ji,
I am not a intermediary or an agent of Pandit Bhooshan Priya Ji.You have challenged Bhooshan Priya Ji's modus opernadi and i am supporting him because I have seen the results, and I am not the single person who is been benefited by the remedies suggested by him.I have full faith in the system used by Pandit Bhooshan Priya Ji of Bhav Spasth for rectifying the varshphal table.He is ready to answer on a public forum but i think you don't have the guts to face the challenge.Anyhow i am forwarding you the reply which is written by Pandit Bhooshan Priya Ji on the public forum of Lal Kitab _Discussion group.
with regards
Sukhwinder Sharma
Dear Goel Saheb,
I appreciate the effort made by Sreenadh ji in trying to find out the algorithm used in the Varsh Phal table of the Lal Kitab. I feel grateful that a scholar of Sreenadh’s eminence takes interest in Lal Kitab.
At some stage or the other, some of us had tried to find out the logic, but had failed. Here is some one else who has taken up the task; instead of encouraging him we are trying to discourage him through our comments.
You as an engineer know very well that whenever numbers are generated, they have to follow a law, an inherent logic, howsoever complex it may be; so must the LK varsh phal table too.
Studying this logic falls in the domain of mathematics/statistics. It is a technique which is not system specific. For a mathematician / statistician it doesn’t make a difference whether he is analyzing a table from LK or the Economic Survey of India. Therefore the plea that Sreenadh ji isn’t familiar with Lal Kitab is not relevant.
Sreenadh ji has made a preliminary investigation into the table. It is not complete yet as he himself said, â€Å"There seems to be something more to it, related to the possibility of permutation combination possible in metrics of numbers.â€
Therefore let us not jump to conclusions.
Yes, if Sreenadh ji, or any body else for that matter, finds the algorithm used in the LK table and also detects a few errors, then I will accept the modified version to experiment with. If the logic is known and the table gets modified, then yes it could mean that not only me, but every body else too, had been using a table which had a few errors.
We do not consider the LK varsh phal table as a divine revelation. For us it is a man made table, a human effort, in which a possibility of a few errors could always exist.
Now coming to the issue of Bhav-Spashtha
Long back we had already discussed about the Bhav-Spashtha.
We, the Aligarh Group of Lal Kitab, use Ptolemaic or modus equalis system of Bhav spashtha.
Initially I had used the Porphyry's system because this was the one
I learnt first when I worked out the Ascendant and the Dasham
manually. Later I used the Lahiri ephemeris for it.
Through our experience we found that the equal house system suits us
best.
Your comment was â€Å"The use of equal house division is very rational and goes well with Indian Astrological system.â€
With great regards,
Bhooshan Priya
--- In astrostudents@yahoogroups.com, Rajinder Bhatia <rajinderbhatia2002@...> wrote:
>
>
>
> Sukhwinder Jee,
> I raised�a question and a doubt�about Pt Bhushan Priya's modus operndi regarding
> the Varshphal table. I am sure that she has read the�question; she should�answer
> it here.�She shouldn't have the need to�appoint you as an�intermediary or an
> agent telling�me or Shri GK Goel�how to go about it.�
> The ball is in�Pt Bhushan Priya's�court.
>
> I wish you well.
>
> Respectfully,
> Rajinder Bhatia
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: sukhwinder <astroremedies.in@...>
> To: astrostudents@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Thu, January 13, 2011 12:52:26 AM
> Subject: [astrostudents] Re: Regarding Suggestion
>
> �
> Respected G.K.Goel Ji,
>
> Pandit Bhooshan Priya Ji is ready to answer all your queries. You can ask your
> question in Lal Kitab_Discussion group.
>
> with regards
> Sukhwinder Sharma
>
> --- In astrostudents@yahoogroups.com, Gopal Goel <gkgoel1937@> wrote:
>
> �Dear Sukhwinder Sharma,
> �Sir, I think you have not understood the comments of�
> Mr. Rajendra Bhatia.
> �He said If- I repeat if - Mr Bhoosan ji now questions the validity
> �of correctness and authenticity of LK Varsha Phala tables , how
> �on earth he was prescribing remedies for last ten years.
> �Now Pt. Bhoosan ji who had a rich experience of Lk for 10 years
> �seems to agree with a person who never studied original LK
> �and had only 10 days experience according to his own admission.
> �
> I do not know you as well all the three persons personally . But Mr. Bhatia
> �is talking lot of sense , and all of us should address points raised by him in
> �right earnest.
> �
> As far as Bhava division is considered , these may be divided in three broad�
> categories:
> �1. Compartmental system , in which signs and bhava are inseparable.
> �2. Each bhava extents to 15 degrees on either side of ascending degree
> �and this degree in the mid-point of each house
> �3. Sripati ,K.P. etc methods - these methods seems to be inappropriate
> �in the context of LK SYSTEM
> �As clear from several mails , Pt. Roopchand ji used to rectify BIRTH CHART�
> with the help of Palm . Now a days most of the savants even if they prepare
> �nativity with the help of palm , they are not able to match it with birth�
> chart.
> �Now they have come around to the view that both are separate nativities.
> �
> I request either you or Mr. Bhooshan ji to through some light as to which�
> method�
> �
> they follow for house division.
> �It will also be nice if either of you guide us on LK varsha phala tables.
> �Regards,
> �
> �
> G.K.GOEL
> �Ph: 09350311433
> �Add: L-409, SARITA VIHAR
> �NEW DELHI-110 076
> �INDIA
>
No comments:
Post a Comment