Dear Sreenadh Ji,
The Varshphal table runs for 120 years and it was obviously based on the sequence 1-4-9-3-11-5-7-2-12-10-11-6 which is clearly repeating itself 10 times in line under House no.1 and then for the other houses the same sequence start one year later for each house. Everybody can see this, and there is nothing new in this.
This sequence seems to be the basic principle behind the table, but in order to make the table work a large number of modifications had been added to the table. This is where you go completely wrong. These are modifications and NOT mistakes. If we were to use the table produced by you for the Varshphal-kundalis, the results, predictions and everything would be all wrong.
Obviously, to find out if this Varshphal-table is right or wrong a good deal of knowledge about the LK-system itself is needed. You, however, think you can reform this system even without having studied it. In my opinion this is a somewhat arrogant position to take.
Lal Kitab was written by the late Pt. Roop Chand Joshi. It was given to him in dreams and visions by an unseen spirit, almost like what happened with Edgar Cayce.
In my opinion Pt. Roop Chand Joshi was the one and only Lal Kitab expert. Compared to him all others, my own good self included, are merely students of Lal Kitab.
My interest in Lal Kitab started back in 1982 when I read a very interesting article about Lal Kitab and Pt. Roop Chand Joshi in the quarterly magazine "Fate and Destiny" edited by my first mentor the late hindu astrologer Manik Chand Jain.
The article was titled "Glimpses of Lal Kitab, part 1 & 2. You can find it in the files-section of the Astrostudents-Lalkitab Group. Really you should read it yourself. It is a very good and and informative article.
Since 1982 I have collected and read any information about Lal Kitab that I could come across. Later, with the help and support of a few good friends, I have studied the Lal Kitab itself, and I am now using this unique method on a daily basis for my clients etc.
Best regards,
Finn Wandahl
--- In astrostudents@yahoogroups.com, Sreenadh OG <sreesog@...> wrote:
>
>
> --- On Fri, 1/7/11, sreesog <sreesog@...> wrote:
>
> From: sreesog <sreesog@...>
> Subject: [AIA] Re: Lalkitab Review - 8
> To: ancient_indian_astrology@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Friday, January 7, 2011, 9:48 AM
>
>
>
> Dear Fin ji,
> Can you please share with us your lalkitab understanding on this Varshaphala table please. From your mail I presume that you understand well and is an expert not only this Varshaphala table but also in Lalkitab system. I would love to hear your Lalkitab teachings.
>
> Note: Before commenting on something we usually need to prove our worth to do the same on that subject, either through previous work on the same line; or the worth and extra info shared through the elaborate comment/review itself - this is a standard rule of such such communications I think. And I am trying to fall into the second category during these reviews, since I don't belong to the first category as far as Lalkitab is concerned. To which of these category you fall into as far as lalkitab is concerned? I am certain that you are not in to the second category since this was a two line comment with no extra info. So you must be into the first category - i.e. person who has proved his worth in Lalkitab system through his previous contribution to that system. Oh! But I never heard that you were a Lalkitab expert! I must be missing something here - please do share your lalkitab expertise with us all. Hope to hear from you more.
> Love and regards,
> Sreenadh
>
> --- In ancient_indian_astrology@yahoogroups.com, "Finn Wandahl" <finn.wandahl@> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > Dear Nirmal,
> >
> > Well spoken! Sreenadh hasn't cracked anything at all. Sreenadh should study Lal Kitab rather than try to reform something he doesn't understand.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Finn Wandahl
>
No comments:
Post a Comment